Aftershocks Town Meeting

---

Overview

Duration: 56 Minutes
Year Level: Year 11
Subject: Drama
Text: Aftershocks by Paul Brown and Newcastle Workers’ Cultural Action Committee
Class Size: 18 students
Lesson Format: Process Drama – Town Hall Simulation

---

Australian Curriculum Links

Subject: The Arts – Drama (Years 9–10 applicable, extended depth for Year 11)
Curriculum Area Focus:

• ACADRM050 – Perform devised and scripted drama maintaining commitment to role.
• ACADRR051 – Analyse a range of drama from contemporary and past times, including the drama of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples, to explore differing viewpoints and develop understanding of drama practice.
• ACADRM049 – Improvise with the elements of drama and narrative structure to develop ideas, and explore subtext to shape devised and scripted drama.

In this Year 11 context, students further refine these skills by engaging in mature, realistic performance scenarios (process drama) and tackling complex themes of trauma, community recovery, and political response, aligning with senior secondary drama standards in most Australian states and territories.

---

Unit Objectives Addressed

• Objective 1: Demonstrate skills of drama through sustained roleplay, characterisation, and improvisation.
• Objective 3: Interpret the purpose and context in "Aftershocks" to communicate layered dramatic meaning during performance.

---

Lesson Focus

Students will engage in a process drama activity structured as a town hall meeting following the Newcastle earthquake. They will adopt prescribed character roles (based on or inspired by real people from Aftershocks) and improvise dialogue/responses to structured prompts concerning emotional, social, and infrastructural impacts.

---

Learning Intentions

By the end of this lesson, students will:

• Engage in authentic character work, using improvisation to reflect trauma and community leadership.
• Interpret key themes and contexts from Aftershocks, such as grief, blame, resilience, and power dynamics.
• Collaboratively navigate complex decision-making scenarios in role.
• Demonstrate understanding of documentary theatre techniques and their power to represent truth.

---

Success Criteria

Students will achieve success by:

• Remaining in-role throughout the drama.
• Demonstrating understanding of character motivations through voice, gesture, and language.
• Responding to unfolding dramatic circumstances faithfully and creatively.

---

Resources

• Character role cards (based on characters inspired by Aftershocks)
• Seating arranged in a semi-circle (simulating a community meeting space)
• Earthquake soundscape clip (brief audio to create atmosphere)
• Simple printed name tags per character
• A gavel or bell for the facilitator role (played by the teacher)

---

Lesson Breakdown (56 minutes)

⏰ 0–6 MIN — Introduction and Atmosphere Setting

• Teacher welcomes students and reintroduces Aftershocks as a text grounded in real events and real voices.
• Play a soft earthquake aftermath soundscape (rubble, murmurs, silence).
• Pose a reflective question:

  “What happens after a disaster, when the cameras disappear, and it’s just the community left?”

• Outline today’s activity: A town hall process drama, featuring voices from the Newcastle Trades Hall and surrounding community, who are reacting to the 1989 earthquake and engaging in recovery talks.

⏰ 6–15 MIN — Role Allocation and Briefing

• Distribute character role cards (pre-prepared, each with: name, age, occupation, key opinion, emotional state).
• Sample roles might include:
  • Union Secretary
  • Nurse from John Hunter Hospital
  • Local business owner
  • Grieving family member
  • SES volunteer
  • Mayor
  • Journalist for the Herald
  • Engineer
  • Drama teacher at Newcastle High
• Students create simple name badges and find an element of voice or gesture to begin embodying the role.
• Provide 90 seconds per student to introduce themselves in character with: “My name is ___. This is where I was when the earthquake hit, and this is how it’s affected me…”

Teacher Tip: Play a character yourself – perhaps as a stern council chairperson to help structure and intervene as required.

⏰ 15–45 MIN — Town Hall Meeting: Structured Improvisation

Structure:

• Teacher (in role as facilitator) allows open-floor discussion across these timed phases:

🟡 Phase 1 (7 min): Immediate Emotional Fallout

Prompts:

• “Who do we hold responsible for what happened at the Workers' Club?”
• “What support do we need that hasn’t arrived?”
• Encourage direct conflict (respectfully) between opposing views. Use body, space, and voice to show tension.

🔵 Phase 2 (8 min): Physical and Economic Recovery

Prompts:

• “Should the Council prioritise restoring businesses over homes?”
• “How do we honour those who died?”
• Students should gesture towards the bigger picture—make strategic and ethical proposals.

🟢 Phase 3 (7 min): Long-Term Community Impact

Prompts:

• “How has our community changed forever?”

• “What stories must be remembered?” This is a more reflective portion encouraging pathos, listening, and emotional honesty.

• Teacher subtly moves from facilitative to participative role: improvises with students, provokes reactions, or throws in surprise news (e.g. recent government funding cut, a protest forming outside, a petition circulating, etc.)

Teacher Note: Give students realistic and challenging opinion prompts. Encourage vocal dynamics and spatial movement depending on character status (sitting quietly vs standing to demand attention, etc.)

⏰ 45–50 MIN — In-Role Freeze & Reflection Hot Seat

• Freeze action; ask 3 students (still in character) to sit in the “hot seat” for 60 seconds each.
• Class rapid-fires questions (“How did today’s meeting impact your outlook?”, “What will you do next?”).
• This sharpens quick-thinking and extends depth of improvisation.

⏰ 50–56 MIN — De-role and Group Reflection

• Facilitated gentle de-role process:
  • “Remove your character badge and place it in the circle.”
  • Stand and shake out the character physically.
  • One word to describe the experience (spoken around the circle).
• Teacher leads reflective discussion:
  • “What did you notice about how Aftershocks explores recovery?”
  • “Which dramatic skills served you best today?”
  • “How did the context of the text influence your character's choices?”

---

Extension / Homework (Optional)

Reflective journal entry/monologue in character:
Write a post-meeting monologue (250–300 words) from your character reflecting privately on what happened during the meeting. What did they say? What did they wish they'd said?

---

Differentiation

• More reserved students can be briefed for “quieter” but vital roles (an observer, a community whisperer, a best friend grieving).
• Strong actors/fast thinkers take more contentious characters to spark engagement.
• Debrief structured with clear emotional off-ramping for sensitive students.
• Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander perspectives can be intentionally woven in with respect—e.g. including a character from the Biripi or Awabakal community, focusing on cultural response and healing.

---

Assessment (Formative)

• Observe students’ improvisation skills, vocal clarity, physicality, and engagement.
• Inform future monologue or scene creation from these improvised characters.
• Use rubric aligned to ACADRM050 & ACADRR051, focusing on commitment to role, interpretation of dramatic meaning, and collaboration.

---

Teacher Reflection Questions

• Did students respond authentically and empathetically to the voices of the original Aftershocks figures?
• How did this method deepen their understanding of documentary theatre?
• Should some roles be revisited or extended into assessment tasks or performances?

---

Final Thought

This lesson invokes the power of real words, real people, real transformation—a true tribute to Aftershocks as both drama and social documentation. It invites students not to “act” but to listen, interpret, and become.

---

Prepared For: Australian Year 11 Drama Educators
Prepared By: Drama Curriculum Support (AI-Enhanced Resource)
Version: 2024 – Aligned with current ACARA framework

---