Hero background

Character Relationships

English • 70 • 10 students • Created with AI following Aligned with Australian Curriculum (F-10)

Download now

Free PDF · we'll email you a copy

English
70
10 students
22 July 2026

Teaching Instructions

This is lesson 14 of 25 in the unit "Exploring Cultural Voices in Literature". Lesson Title: WALT: Character Relationships Lesson Description: Analyze relationships among characters. Success: Discuss how these relationships develop themes. Use role-playing to explore relationships.

Overview

In this lesson (14 of 25) in Exploring Cultural Voices in Literature, students analyse how character relationships shape meaning, influence events, and develop themes. They then use structured role-play to explore how relationships change over time.

Learning intentions

  • Students will analyse relationships among characters in a chosen text, including power, trust, respect, conflict, and loyalty.
  • Students will explain how relationship shifts contribute to themes about culture, identity, belonging, or community.
  • Students will use evidence from the text to support interpretations about character motivation and viewpoint.
  • Students will communicate interpretations through role-play, using appropriate language, tone, and perspective.

Success criteria

  • I can describe the relationship between at least two characters and identify what changes (or stays the same).
  • I can link relationship changes to a theme and justify my link using textual evidence.
  • I can portray a character’s perspective in role-play and show how choices affect others.
  • I can respond to peers respectfully, using feedback that improves my analysis.

Curriculum links

  • English: analysing how texts construct meaning through character, voice, structure, and language choices.
  • English: making and justifying interpretations using evidence from the text.
  • English: planning, drafting, and presenting ideas for a purpose and audience (speaking and listening).
  • Literacy: using strategies for comprehension, especially when interpreting viewpoint and implied meaning.

Lesson structure (70 minutes)

  1. 0–5 min: WALT and warm-up
  • Display the WALT statement: We Are Learning To analyse character relationships and how they develop themes.
  • Quick prompt: “Which relationship in the text feels most important so far—why?” Students share one sentence with a partner.
  1. 5–15 min: Model analysis with evidence
  • Teacher selects a short passage (or summarises key moments) showing interaction between characters.
  • Students annotate a “relationship lens”: who has power, who seeks approval, who resists, and how the tone shifts.
  • Teacher models linking: “When character X speaks/acts this way, it suggests…, which supports the theme…”
  1. 15–25 min: Relationship mapping
  • In pairs, students create a simple relationship map for two characters: starting position → conflict/turning point → current state.
  • They must include 2 pieces of textual evidence (short quotes or paraphrased moments) for at least one turning point.
  • Teacher circulates with guiding questions: “What changed? What caused it? What does it reveal about the theme?”
  1. 25–40 min: Role-play rehearsal (purposeful)
  • Groups of 3–5 (for 10 students, rotate roles in two groups): assign roles for two key characters plus a “narrator/observer.”
  • Students rehearse a 60–90 second scene based on the turning point, focusing on:
  • How each character’s goals affect their words/actions
  • How relationship tension shows in body language and tone
  • Observer uses an “analysis checklist”: evidence of motivation, signals of power/trust, and theme-relevant change.
  1. 40–55 min: Role-play performances
  • Each group performs once. After each performance, peers complete a “what changed?” statement:
  • “I noticed the relationship moved from __ to __ because __ (evidence).”
  • Teacher prompts deeper thinking: “How does this affect the theme, not just the plot?”
  1. 55–65 min: Written mini-response
  • Individual task: 8–10 sentences or a structured paragraph answering:
  • “How do relationships among characters develop themes in the text?”
  • Requirements: clear claim, relationship description, theme link, and at least 2 evidence references.
  1. 65–70 min: Exit ticket
  • Students submit one exit ticket sentence:
  • “The most important relationship shift is… because it shows…”
  • Teacher identifies common strengths and one target for next lesson.

Resources

  • Student copies of the set text or excerpt for this unit (printed or accessible digital)
  • Highlighters/annotating pens (or sticky notes)
  • Relationship map templates (one page, simple boxes/arrows)
  • Role-play cue cards (character goals, relationship lens prompts)
  • Observer checklist sheet
  • Sentence starters for analysis paragraphs (claim, evidence, theme link)
  • Timer visible to students
  • Dyslexia-friendly reading options: audio recordings of the excerpt, text-at-a-glance summaries, large-font passages, and reduced-text excerpt strips

Assessment

  • Formative: teacher observation during relationship mapping and role-play (use guiding questions and targeted feedback).
  • Formative: written mini-response assessed against the success criteria (claim, evidence, theme link).
  • Formative: exit ticket to confirm understanding of relationship shifts and thematic connection.

Differentiation

  • Support: provide a partially completed relationship map, sentence starters, and a word bank for relationship language (trust, control, acceptance, resistance).
  • Support for reading difficulties: offer audio + printed large-font excerpts; allow students to select from smaller excerpt segments; reduce copying by using “choose and paste” or teacher-provided short quotes.
  • Extension: ask students to analyse how language choices (e.g., dialogue style, narration tone) shape perceptions of relationships; include an alternative interpretation they can justify with evidence.
  • EAL: allow bilingual glossary support for key vocabulary; encourage response options (talk first, then short written); model how to paraphrase evidence.
  • SEN: assign clear role-play responsibilities (e.g., observer focuses on one checklist item); offer a scaffolded paragraph structure with sentence frames.

Assessment adjustments for dyslexia-friendly delivery (within the lesson)

  • Audio-first for the key passage and teacher read-aloud before independent reading
  • Chunked excerpts with highlighted sections that contain the best evidence
  • Choice in demonstrating understanding: role-play observer notes OR short verbal explanation recorded by teacher for students who struggle with writing speed

Create Your Own AI Lesson Plan

Join thousands of teachers using Kuraplan AI to create personalized lesson plans that align with Aligned with Australian Curriculum (F-10) in minutes, not hours.

AI-powered lesson creation
Curriculum-aligned content
Ready in minutes

Created with Kuraplan AI

Generated using openai/gpt-5.4-nano

🌟 Trusted by 1000+ Schools

Join educators across Australia