Hero background

Investigating State Changes

Science • 80 • 22 students • Created with AI following Aligned with Australian Curriculum (F-10)

Download now

Free PDF · we'll email you a copy

Science
80
22 students
16 July 2026

Teaching Instructions

This is lesson 6 of 8 in the unit "Exploring States of Matter". Lesson Title: Investigating Changes of State Lesson Description: WALT: Understand concepts of evaporation and condensation. Observe processes and predict outcomes. Success Criteria: Accurately describe evaporation and condensation processes. Differentiation: Use visual aids to support understanding. Extension: Research real-world examples of evaporation in the environment.

Overview

In this 80-minute lesson, students build on earlier lessons in the unit by using particle models to explain observable changes of state. They focus on evaporation and condensation, linking the motion/arrangement of particles to what they can see, measure, and predict.

Learning intentions

  • Students will model particle behaviour to explain evaporation and condensation.
  • Students will observe evidence of evaporation and condensation in a simple, safe investigation.
  • Students will plan and conduct a fair test (with support) and record measurements accurately.
  • Students will compare their results with predictions and identify possible sources of error.

Success criteria

  • I can describe evaporation as a change where liquid particles spread and move into the air.
  • I can describe condensation as a change where water vapour particles come together to form liquid droplets.
  • I can use evidence from observations (e.g. droplet size/amount, time taken) to support my conclusion.
  • I can explain at least one reason my results might be different from others in the class.

Curriculum links

  • Science — AC9S5U04: explain observable properties of solids, liquids and gases by modelling the motion and arrangement of particles.
  • Science — AC9S5I01: pose investigable questions to identify patterns and test relationships and make reasoned predictions.
  • Science — AC9S5I02: plan and conduct repeatable investigations, including variables, control of fair tests, safety, and record methods.
  • Science — AC9S5I03: use equipment to observe, measure and record data with reasonable precision.
  • Science — AC9S5I05: compare methods/findings, recognise possible sources of error, and draw reasoned conclusions.

Lesson structure (80 minutes)

  1. 0–10 min · Hook: “Why does it disappear?”
  • Teacher displays two jars/bowls: one with a small amount of water in open air and one covered (e.g. cling film with a small hole), plus a short prompt: “What changes and where does the water go?”
  • Students turn-and-talk: write one prediction about what will happen to the water in each container, using words like “liquid”, “air”, “vapour”, “droplets”.
  1. 10–25 min · Direct teach: particle model role-play
  • Teacher leads a quick particle model using students as particles: “liquid particles” packed closely, “gas particles” spread out and move faster.
  • Students act out:
  • Evaporation: some “liquid particles” gain energy, break away, and spread into the “air” space.
  • Condensation: “gas particles” lose energy when near a cooler surface and gather into droplets.
  • Whole-class checks: Teacher asks, “What are we modelling—movement, arrangement, or both?”
  1. 25–45 min · Guided investigation: condensation evidence
  • Teacher sets up a repeatable station for groups: a clear cup/jar with warm water (teacher-prepared if needed), covered with a lid or plastic wrap; ice placed on top so students can observe droplets forming on the underside.
  • Students (in groups of 3–4) record a simple table:
  • Start time (minute/second), end time when droplets clearly appear.
  • Observations: number of droplets or “light/mid/heavy” condensation, and where droplets form (edges vs centre).
  • Teacher circulates, checking fair-test decisions: only change the variable being tested (e.g. temperature of the surface using “more/less ice” or “same ice for each trial”), while keeping cup size and water amount the same.
  • Safety reminder: no tasting, care with warm water, ice handled with gloves/towel if required.
  1. 45–60 min · Fair test planning (quick method refinement)
  • Teacher provides two possible questions on the board, students choose one:
  • “How does surface cooling (more/less ice) affect how quickly condensation forms?”
  • “How does water temperature affect when droplets appear?”
  • Students draft a brief method (3–4 dot points): variable to change, measure/record, and what to keep the same; include a predicted outcome using particle language.
  • Teacher confirms the plan is repeatable (same procedure each group).
  1. 60–72 min · Compare and reason: evidence to conclusion
  • Groups share one key result and one observation detail.
  • Teacher guides students to recognise sources of error: timing differences, uneven ice contact, amount of water variation, visibility of droplets, measuring “first visible droplets” subjectivity.
  • Students complete a short reasoning statement: “Our prediction was/was not supported because…”
  1. 72–80 min · Exit ticket
  • Students answer:
  • “In one sentence, explain evaporation and condensation using particle language.”
  • “Name one possible source of error in our investigation.”

Resources

  • Clear cups/jars, lids or cling film/plastic wrap
  • Ice (teacher-prepared quantities) and towels/gloves as needed
  • Warm water prepared safely by teacher (or room-temperature water if required)
  • Stopwatches or classroom timers
  • Measuring jug or cup (to standardise water volume)
  • Data tables (printed) for time and condensation observations
  • Marker pens, whiteboard/markers
  • Role-play particle cards or simple labels: liquid, gas, cool surface
  • Safety signage and reminder cards (no tasting, careful handling)

Assessment

  • Teacher observation checklist during modelling: correct use of “particles moving/spreading/gathering” when describing changes of state.
  • Review group data tables for reasonable precision in timing and clear, observable descriptions.
  • Exit ticket used to assess correct explanations of evaporation and condensation and identification of a plausible error.

Differentiation

  • Support:
  • Provide sentence starters: “Evaporation happens when…”, “Condensation happens when…”, “We measured…”, “A possible error is…”
  • Use visual aids: particle diagram cards (liquid packed / gas spread / droplets forming).
  • Assign roles in groups (timer, recorder, equipment manager) to ensure all students contribute.
  • Extension (advanced learners):
  • Challenge students to estimate/compare droplet rate using an additional measure (e.g. time to reach “heavy condensation”).
  • Ask: “What real-world factors would affect condensation in homes (humidity, temperature, airflow)?” and require a particle-based explanation.
  • EAL/SEN:
  • Pre-teach key terms (evaporation, condensation, vapour, droplets, cool surface) with gestures and examples.
  • Allow oral explanation to complement written exit ticket where appropriate.

Create Your Own AI Lesson Plan

Join thousands of teachers using Kuraplan AI to create personalized lesson plans that align with Aligned with Australian Curriculum (F-10) in minutes, not hours.

AI-powered lesson creation
Curriculum-aligned content
Ready in minutes

Created with Kuraplan AI

Generated using openai/gpt-5.4-nano

🌟 Trusted by 1000+ Schools

Join educators across Australia