Hero background

Persuasion Devices Today

English • 60 • 25 students • Created with AI following Aligned with Australian Curriculum (F-10)

Download now

Free PDF · we'll email you a copy

English
60
25 students
14 July 2026

Teaching Instructions

I want the plan to focus on persuasive devices with reasons why we use them to persuade and examples.

  • Modal verbs
  • Objective Language -Subjective Language Rhetorical question rule of 3

Overview

Students will learn how persuasive texts use specific language features to influence audiences. They will focus on modal verbs, objective vs subjective language, rhetorical questions, and the rule of 3, building toward writing an accurate, audience-appropriate persuasive paragraph.

Learning intentions

Students will:

  • identify how persuasive devices help writers engage and influence an audience
  • recognise and use modal verbs (e.g. should, could, must) to express advice, possibility, and obligation
  • distinguish objective language (facts/verified information) from subjective language (opinions/feelings)
  • use rhetorical questions and the rule of 3 to strengthen a persuasive message
  • draft and revise a short persuasive paragraph using clear structure, punctuation, and vivid, topic-specific vocabulary

Success criteria

Students can:

  • highlight modal verbs in mentor texts and explain the effect on the reader
  • sort sentences into objective and subjective language and justify their choices
  • include at least one rhetorical question and at least one rule-of-3 set (three linked ideas) in their paragraph
  • use persuasive sentences with correct tense, punctuation, and spelling, and re-read to check meaning and accuracy

Curriculum links

  • AC9E6LY03: analysing how text structures and language features work together to meet a text’s purpose and engage/influence audiences
  • AC9E6LA02: understanding uses of objective and subjective language and identifying bias
  • AC9E6LA08: identifying vivid, emotive vocabulary (including idioms/hyperbole) used to persuade
  • AC9E6LY06: planning, creating, editing and publishing written texts using paragraphs, complex sentences, vivid vocabulary, and punctuation/spelling features

Lesson structure (60 minutes)

  1. 0–5 min · Engage with a mini hook. Teacher shows two short statements about a Year 6 topic (e.g. “We should ban sugary drinks at school.” / “Ban sugary drinks! It’s terrible and awful!”). Students quickly vote: which sounds more persuasive and why.

  2. 5–15 min · Direct teach: persuasive language toolkit. Teacher models each device on the board with examples and effects:

  • Modal verbs: “Students should…” “We could…” “Teachers must…” (advice, possibility, obligation)
  • Objective language: verifiable facts, e.g. “School surveys show many students feel tired after lunch.”
  • Subjective language: feelings/opinions, e.g. “It’s exhausting” / “This is a terrible idea.”
  • Rhetorical question: “Why should we ignore the evidence?” (invites agreement)
  • Rule of 3: “Because it’s safer, healthier, and better for everyone.” (three linked reasons for emphasis) Students add one “effect” note under each device (What does this make the audience think/feel/do?).
  1. 15–25 min · Guided practice: sort and label. Teacher provides a 10-sentence strip (mixed objective/subjective; some include modal verbs; some include rhetorical questions; some include rule of 3). Students work in pairs to:
  • underline modal verbs and state their function (should/could/must)
  • label each sentence as objective or subjective
  • circle rhetorical questions
  • box any rule-of-3 set Teacher circulates, asking targeted questions: “Which words show opinion, not facts?” “What makes this question persuasive?”
  1. 25–35 min · Mentor example: analyse structure + devices together. Teacher reads a short persuasive paragraph about the chosen topic (teacher-crafted, age-appropriate). Students highlight:
  • the claim (what the writer wants the audience to do/believe)
  • the reasons (why)
  • the devices (modal verbs, objective vs subjective, rhetorical question, rule of 3) Class discussion focuses on AC9E6LY03: how language features and paragraph purpose work together to influence the audience.
  1. 35–50 min · Independent writing: persuasive paragraph draft. Students draft a persuasive paragraph (6–8 sentences) targeting a specific audience (e.g. “Year 6 students” or “school leadership”). Scaffold on the board:
  • Sentence 1: clear claim
  • Sentences 2–5: reasons using at least 2 modal verbs and a mix of objective + subjective language carefully (facts + impact)
  • Sentence 6: rhetorical question
  • Final sentence: rule of 3 ending (three reasons or three benefits) Teacher prompts for complex sentences: “Add a because clause” or “Use an expanded verb group” (e.g. “will strongly encourage”, “is likely to improve”).
  1. 50–57 min · Editing for impact: teacher-guided re-read checklist. Students swap with a partner and use a short negotiated checklist:
  • I used at least 2 modal verbs
  • I included one rhetorical question
  • I included a rule of 3 set (three linked ideas)
  • My objective sentences include facts (not just opinions)
  • My subjective sentences clearly show opinion/feeling words Pairs explain one editing choice to each other (e.g. “I changed ‘good’ to ‘beneficial’ to sound more specific.”).
  1. 57–60 min · Exit ticket: device identification. Students answer:
  • “Underline one modal verb in your paragraph and write its effect on the reader.”
  • “Write one objective phrase you used (e.g. ‘According to…’ / ‘The data shows…’).”

Resources

  • Device sentence strip (teacher-made, 10–12 sentences)
  • Mentor persuasive paragraph (teacher-made, printed or projected)
  • Student writing paper or digital document
  • Highlighters/colour pencils for objective vs subjective and device marking
  • Editing checklist card
  • Board/slide showing a model paragraph and device examples
  • Timer for timed writing and editing

Assessment

  • Formative: observe pair sorting accuracy (objective/subjective; modal verb identification)
  • Formative: teacher conferences during drafting (check device use and clarity of claim/reasons)
  • Summative-in-class: exit ticket responses demonstrating understanding of modal verbs and objective language use

Differentiation

  • Support: provide sentence starters and a word bank for modal verbs, objective starters (“According to…”, “The survey shows…”), subjective starters (“I believe…”, “It feels…”), and persuasive rule-of-3 endings (“Safer, fairer, better…”).
  • Support: offer a partially completed paragraph plan (Claim + 3 reasons) for students needing structure.
  • Extension: challenge students to add one vivid emotive word/phrase (idiom/hyperbole) while keeping objective facts separate from opinion, and to vary complex sentence beginnings (e.g. “Because…”, “Although…”, “As a result…”).
  • EAL/SEN: allow vocabulary support sheets and permit oral rehearsal before writing; accept first-draft revisions focusing on device accuracy and clarity of audience, not perfect punctuation.

Create Your Own AI Lesson Plan

Join thousands of teachers using Kuraplan AI to create personalized lesson plans that align with Aligned with Australian Curriculum (F-10) in minutes, not hours.

AI-powered lesson creation
Curriculum-aligned content
Ready in minutes

Created with Kuraplan AI

Generated using openai/gpt-5.4-nano

🌟 Trusted by 1000+ Schools

Join educators across Australia