Hero background

Presentation of Findings

Social Sciences • 60 • 25 students • Created with AI following Aligned with Australian Curriculum (F-10)

Download now

Free PDF · we'll email you a copy

Social Sciences
60
25 students
27 July 2026

Teaching Instructions

This is lesson 16 of 16 in the unit "Exploring Landscapes and Landforms". Lesson Title: Presentation of Findings Lesson Description: Students present findings on their chosen landscape or landform at risk.

Overview

In this final lesson of the unit “Exploring Landscapes and Landforms”, students present their findings about a chosen landscape or landform at risk. They practise clear communication, explain environmental change and management strategies, and respond respectfully to questions from peers.

Learning intentions

Students will:

  • present a short, structured report about a landscape or landform at risk
  • explain how places and environments change over time and why this matters
  • identify and justify management and protection strategies for the environment
  • use geographical thinking (cause/effect, impacts, evidence, and conclusions) to answer audience questions

Success criteria

Students can:

  • deliver a 2–3 minute presentation with an introduction, key findings, and a clear conclusion
  • explain at least two causes of environmental change and two impacts on people and/or ecosystems
  • propose at least two management/protection actions and justify why they would help
  • respond to questions using evidence from their notes or resources

Curriculum links

  • GELS-PRI-01: Students describe how places and environments change
  • GELS-MAN-01: Students demonstrate ways to manage and protect a place or environment
  • GELS-APC-02: Students identify ways in which Aboriginal Peoples care for and manage Country (where relevant to the chosen landscape)
  • Thinking and working geographically: using evidence, cause/effect, and communication to show understanding

Lesson structure (60 minutes)

  1. 0–5 min · Warm-up & goals. Teacher shows the presentation success checklist and briefly reviews time limits and expectations; students read the checklist and highlight what they will practise.

  2. 5–15 min · Model and planning refresh. Teacher models a strong 2–3 minute structure (hook, “At risk because…”, “Evidence shows…”, “Actions…because…”, conclusion) and demonstrates one sample Q&A response; students add a “presentation skeleton” to their notes (3 headings only).

  3. 15–45 min · Student presentations (round-robin). Teacher organises students into presentation groups (or a whole-class order with timed turns); students present one at a time while peers use the checklist to record 2 strengths and 1 question.

  4. 45–55 min · Peer feedback and question time. Teacher prompts students to ask only specific, respectful questions (e.g., “Which evidence supports that?”, “How would that action reduce risk?”); students respond using their notes and evidence, aiming to revise wording for clarity.

  5. 55–60 min · Exit reflection (quick). Teacher gives a short prompt; students complete a 3-sentence exit ticket: (1) one thing I improved, (2) one management action I’d strengthen, (3) one question I would still ask.

Resources

  • Student presentation checklist (print or digital)
  • Timer (projected or classroom timer)
  • “Presentation skeleton” template (3 headings)
  • Notes/graphic organisers from earlier lessons (cause/effect, impacts, management actions)
  • One-question-per-slide or cue card template (if using slides)
  • Teacher feedback form for summative-style comments (simple rubric copy)
  • Devices or offline copies for any images/maps used in presentations
  • Sentence starters for responses (e.g., “My evidence is…”, “One impact is…”, “This action matters because…”)

Assessment

  • Formative during presentations: teacher listens for clarity, evidence use, and alignment to management and protection strategies.
  • Peer feedback: peers record two strengths and one question using the checklist.
  • Exit ticket: short written check of environmental change explanation and at least one justified action.

Differentiation

  • Scaffold for students needing support: provide sentence starters, a completed example skeleton, and a “must-include” list (cause/effect, impacts, 2 actions, conclusion).
  • Extension for students ready to challenge: require one “feasibility” justification (who benefits, timeframe, and potential trade-offs) and one deeper link to evidence quality (source/type of evidence).
  • Language support / EAL: allow bilingual word banks for key terms (environmental change, impact, management, risk, evidence). Permit responses using cue cards even if not speaking at length.
  • SEN support: offer reduced presentation length (e.g., 1–2 minutes) or structured roles (speaker + evidence reader). Provide checklists with fewer items if needed.
  • Choice and engagement: allow presentations as posters, slides, or a spoken report with images, as long as success criteria are met.

Progression note (for the teacher)

This lesson assumes students have already selected a landscape/landform at risk, collected evidence, and drafted management/protection actions. Today focuses on communicating findings clearly and strengthening explanations using geographical thinking—concluding the unit with demonstrated alignment to managing and protecting environments and describing how environments change.

Create Your Own AI Lesson Plan

Join thousands of teachers using Kuraplan AI to create personalized lesson plans that align with Aligned with Australian Curriculum (F-10) in minutes, not hours.

AI-powered lesson creation
Curriculum-aligned content
Ready in minutes

Created with Kuraplan AI

Generated using openai/gpt-5.4-nano

🌟 Trusted by 1000+ Schools

Join educators across Australia