Peer Review Session

Overview

This 50-minute lesson focuses on strengthening students’ writing and critical thinking skills through guided peer review of their animal report drafts. Students will apply key language arts competencies from the British Columbia Curriculum by collaboratively engaging in constructive feedback, specifically targeting clarity and writing conventions.

---

Curriculum Alignment

British Columbia Curriculum - Grade 3 English Language Arts

• Big Ideas:

  • People communicate to exchange ideas and share their stories and experiences (Writing).
  • Writing involves exploring our ideas and using appropriate language features and conventions for our purpose and audience.

• Curricular Competencies:

  • Use writing processes to plan, draft, revise, and edit to improve clarity and ideas.
  • Use language conventions appropriately in written work (e.g., grammar, punctuation, spelling).
  • Use feedback to revise written text to improve meaning, clarity, and impact.

• Content:

  • Writing forms and genres: Reports
  • Language features and conventions: simple and compound sentences, punctuation (full stops, commas, question marks), spelling strategies
  • Strategies to edit and revise written work

---

Learning Objectives

By the end of the lesson, students will be able to:

• Use a peer review checklist to provide constructive and specific feedback on their partner’s animal report draft.
• Identify strengths and areas for improvement related to clarity and language conventions in their peer’s writing.
• Apply feedback received to begin revising their own draft.
• Exhibit respectful communication during peer interactions.

---

Materials Needed

• Copies of the Peer Review Checklist (dyslexia-friendly format; clear, large font; coloured overlays optional)
• Student drafts of animal reports
• Pencils, coloured pens (for marking feedback)
• Anchor chart on “Giving Constructive Feedback” (examples of kind, specific, and helpful comments)
• Whiteboard or smartboard to model examples
• Timer or visual countdown tool
• Noise-reduction headphones (optional for sensory-sensitive students)

---

Lesson Breakdown

1. Introduction and Review (10 minutes)

• Recap the purpose and structure of animal reports, highlighting clarity and conventions.
• Introduce the Peer Review Checklist, reviewing each item collaboratively. Example checklist items:
  • Is the main idea clear?
  • Are sentences complete and easy to understand?
  • Is punctuation used correctly?
  • Are there any spelling mistakes?
• Model an example of peer feedback using a sample paragraph projected on the board, thinking aloud how to give kind and specific feedback.
• Emphasise the importance of encouragement and respectful language during peer review.

2. Peer Review Activity (25 minutes)

• Arrange students in pairs (consider strengths and support needs).
• Each student reads their partner’s draft quietly, then uses the checklist to provide feedback in coloured pen.
• Circulate to support with reading difficulties, scaffold feedback language with sentence starters (e.g., “I like how you...”, “You could improve by...”).
• Encourage partners to discuss the feedback orally after written comments, practising respectful communication skills.

3. Reflection and Revision Planning (10 minutes)

• Students reflect silently in their writing journals: What feedback did I find most helpful? What will I focus on revising?
• Teacher facilitates a brief whole-group sharing of reflections and revision strategies.
• Optionally, students begin revising part of their draft based on feedback (if time allows).

4. Extension and Differentiation (5 minutes)

• For advanced learners: Challenge them to suggest vocabulary improvements or sentence variety to their partner.
• For learners requiring more support: Provide a simplified checklist with fewer items and one-on-one support during peer review.
• Offer audio versions of peers’ drafts (recorded or student-read aloud) for dyslexic learners who benefit from auditory input.

---

Assessment

• Formative: Observation of peer review conversations for respectful communication and understanding of feedback principles.
• Checklist Completion: Completed peer review checklists collected to assess ability to identify clarity and conventions errors.
• Self-reflection journal: Students’ statements on revision goals provide insight into comprehension of feedback use.

---

Teacher Tips

• Use positive reinforcement to build confidence during peer editing.
• Manage noise levels with visual timers and movement breaks between paired reviews.
• Create a “Feedback Language Bank” poster with sentence starters to aid students during reviews.
• Monitor pairs to ensure productive dialogue; intervene to guide if feedback becomes vague or negative.

---

Sample Peer Review Checklist (Dyslexia-Friendly Format)

Peer Review Checklist	Yes	No	Notes / Suggestions
The main idea is clear and easy to understand.	☐	☐
Sentences are complete and make sense.	☐	☐
Punctuation is correct (full stops, commas).	☐	☐
Spelling is mostly correct.	☐	☐
The report has interesting facts about the animal.	☐	☐

---

Summary

This lesson builds critical skills in self-regulation, critical thinking, and respectful collaboration by engaging third graders in purposeful peer editing of their animal reports. Aligned tightly with BC’s ELA curricular aims, the lesson recognises diverse learner needs and promotes a growth mindset towards writing through constructive feedback.