
English • 60 • 25 students • Created with AI following Aligned with New Zealand Curriculum
Free PDF · we'll email you a copy
This is lesson 7 of 9 in the unit "Poetry: Craft, Revise, Perform". Lesson Title: Peer Feedback for Poets Lesson Description: Learning intention: We are learning to give kind, specific, and useful feedback about a poem’s clarity, impact, audience, and purpose. The teacher models “Glow, Question, Suggest,” then pairs read drafts aloud, identify a successful craft choice, and offer one question or suggestion. Authors choose which feedback to use and record a revision goal; Year 5 learners use a simplified checklist and Year 6 learners support comments with evidence.
Lesson 7 of 9 in Poetry: Craft, Revise, Perform. Students practise giving kind, specific and useful feedback on a partner’s poem, focusing on clarity, impact, audience and purpose. They decide which feedback to use and record one revision goal.
0–5 minutes – Reconnect with the unit Open with the hook and learning intention slides. Display a short, deliberately unclear poem excerpt and ask: “What could the poet change to help the reader understand or feel more?” Briefly connect responses to clarity, impact, audience and purpose.
5–15 minutes – Model useful feedback Use the Glow, Question, Suggest model slides to introduce:
Model feedback on a familiar four-line poem. Think aloud: “I noticed the repeated word storm, which makes the feeling stronger.” Contrast kind, specific feedback with unhelpful comments such as “It’s good” or “Change everything”. Introduce the literary devices reference cards as an optional vocabulary support.
15–20 minutes – Prepare for peer response Distribute the peer feedback and revision goal sheet. Students read the checklist and highlight or circle one craft feature they will listen for, such as imagery, repetition, rhyme, rhythm, word choice or line breaks. Remind students that the author owns the poem and chooses which feedback to use.
20–38 minutes – Partner reading and feedback Place students in pairs. Partner A reads their draft aloud while Partner B listens without interrupting, then completes one Glow, one Question and one Suggest on the worksheet. Partner B should point to a word, line or feature as evidence where possible. Swap roles after approximately nine minutes.
Year 5 learners may use sentence starters and the simplified checklist: “I liked…”, “I wondered…”, “You could try…”. Year 6 learners should explain the effect of their comment using evidence, for example, “The repeated phrase makes the speaker sound determined.”
38–48 minutes – Clarify and discuss Partners discuss their comments. Authors may ask, “Which line made you think that?” or “What would make this clearer?” The listener rereads the relevant line and explains their response. Circulate, prompt precise language, and check that suggestions relate to the poem’s audience or purpose rather than personal preference alone.
48–56 minutes – Choose a revision goal Students complete the final section of the peer feedback and revision goal sheet. They record:
Emphasise that students do not need to accept every suggestion. Early finishers may make one small revision in a different-coloured pencil, without rewriting the whole poem.
Join thousands of teachers using Kuraplan AI to create personalized lesson plans that align with Aligned with New Zealand Curriculum in minutes, not hours.
Created with Kuraplan AI
Generated using openai/gpt-5.6-luna
🌟 Trusted by 1000+ Schools
Join educators across New Zealand