
Health • 60 • 25 students • Created with AI following Aligned with New Zealand Curriculum
Free PDF · we'll email you a copy
This is lesson 6 of 8 in the unit "Mahitahi and Wellbeing". Lesson Title: Planning a Wellbeing Action Lesson Description: Learning intention: Use collaborative decision-making to plan a practical class or community wellbeing action. Success criteria: I can identify a shared need using student voice; propose an achievable, inclusive action; assign roles, resources, risks, and success measures. Key concepts/vocabulary: whakatau (decision), whai wāhi (participate/take part), mahi tahi, rangatahi voice, consultation, sustainability, accessibility, kaitiakitanga, SMART goal, stakeholder. Activities: Gather anonymous class input about a low-risk wellbeing opportunity; groups analyse themes and select one action, such as a welcoming-space improvement, inclusive active-break resource, peer connection activity, native planting or care project, or positive digital wellbeing campaign; use a planning template covering purpose, audience, tikanga, accessibility, permissions, roles, timeline, risks, and measures; seek teacher approval and, where appropriate, consult whānau, school staff, local iwi, or community partners rather than assuming authority. Formative assessment: Teacher conference with each group; peer “critical friend” feedback; students explain how the plan reflects participation and equity. Differentiation/accessibility: Offer several action formats and role choices, including research, design, communication, logistics, or evaluation; chunk templates, provide exemplars, allow individual contribution plans, and ensure no student is required to lead publicly. Resources: Planning templates, student survey tools, school/community contacts, risk-assessment checklist, materials budget, local environmental or cultural guidance.
In lesson 6 of 8, students use anonymous student voice to identify a shared wellbeing opportunity and collaboratively plan a practical, inclusive action. They build on earlier learning about wellbeing, participation, equity, and mahi tahi by considering stakeholders, permissions, risks, resources, and ways to measure success.
0–5 min · Hook and purpose. Teacher displays the question, “What small change could make our class or school feel healthier, safer, or more welcoming?” using the opening question slide, then introduces whakatau (decision), whai wāhi (participate), rangatahi voice, and mahi tahi. Students silently consider one low-risk wellbeing opportunity and record an initial idea.
5–12 min · Gather student voice. Teacher explains that responses are anonymous, voluntary, and used to identify themes rather than judge individuals; students complete the student voice and action-planning template section 1 or submit responses through the agreed survey tool. Students suggest one practical opportunity, such as a welcoming-space improvement, inclusive active-break resource, peer connection activity, native planting or care project, or positive digital wellbeing campaign.
12–20 min · Identify shared needs. Teacher collates responses into broad themes, avoiding identifying comments, and models distinguishing a need from a solution—for example, “some students feel left out at break times” rather than “buy new equipment”; use the student voice and needs-analysis slides. In groups of four or five, students examine the themes, discuss whose voices may be missing, and select one shared need. Each group records evidence and a draft SMART goal.
20–38 min · Plan the action. Teacher gives each group a planning role structure and conferences briefly with groups as they complete the collaborative wellbeing action plan. Students plan the purpose, audience, tikanga, accessibility, permissions, roles, timeline, resources and budget, possible risks, stakeholders, and success measures. They choose roles such as research, design, communication, logistics, or evaluation. Groups must identify whether consultation with whānau, school staff, local iwi, or community partners is appropriate, rather than assuming authority.
38–50 min · Critical friend review. Teacher explains the feedback protocol on the planning and critical-friend instructions: identify one strength, ask one equity or safety question, and offer one practical suggestion. Groups exchange plans with another group and provide feedback, checking whether the action is achievable, inclusive, accessible, sustainable, culturally respectful, and safe. Groups revise their plan and prepare a 30-second explanation.
50–57 min · Approval conference and sharing. Teacher conducts a rapid conference with each group, checking the proposed action, permissions, risks, roles, and success measures; teacher approves, redirects, or identifies consultation required before action. Each group briefly explains how its plan reflects participation and equity while classmates listen for evidence of mahi tahi and kaitiakitanga.
57–60 min · Exit reflection. Teacher displays the prompts on the reflection and next-steps slide. Students complete the final section of the individual contribution and reflection section: “Our shared need is…”, “Our action supports equity by…”, and “My contribution will be…”. Teacher collects plans and notes which groups require further consultation before lesson 7.
Join thousands of teachers using Kuraplan AI to create personalized lesson plans that align with Aligned with New Zealand Curriculum in minutes, not hours.
Created with Kuraplan AI
Generated using openai/gpt-5.6-luna
🌟 Trusted by 1000+ Schools
Join educators across New Zealand