
Social Sciences • 45 • 30 students • Created with AI following Aligned with New Zealand Curriculum
Free PDF · we'll email you a copy
This is lesson 6 of 8 in the unit "Our Voice, Our Democracy". Lesson Title: Voices, Identity, and Inclusion Lesson Description: 45 minutes. WALT: explain why diverse perspectives matter in civic decision-making. Success criteria: I can identify whose voices may be included or missing; listen and respond respectfully to different perspectives; suggest ways to make participation more inclusive. Learning sequence: Analyse a community scenario from multiple viewpoints and create an inclusive participation checklist, acknowledging tangata whenua and the diverse identities of Aotearoa New Zealand. Differentiation: Offer perspective cards, emotion and vocabulary supports, and opt-in speaking alternatives; carefully scaffold sensitive discussion; extend learners by evaluating how power and access influence whose voices are heard.
In this sixth lesson of Our Voice, Our Democracy, students explore how identity, experience, power, and access can shape participation in civic decision-making. They analyse a community scenario from multiple viewpoints, including tangata whenua and diverse identities in Aotearoa New Zealand, then create a practical checklist for inclusive participation.
0–5 min · Hook and learning purpose. Open with the hook and learning-purpose slides and display the question, “Who gets heard when a community makes a decision?” Students silently consider a recent decision made at school, home, or in their community, then share one possible answer with a partner. Introduce the WALT and success criteria.
5–12 min · Build respectful discussion. Use the respectful discussion slides to establish expectations: listen to understand, avoid assumptions, speak from your own experience, disagree with ideas rather than people, and allow pass or written contributions. Explain that tangata whenua are the first peoples of Aotearoa New Zealand and that iwi, hapū, whānau, and individuals have varied experiences and perspectives. Students help generate two sentence stems, such as “I hear you saying…” and “Another perspective might be…”.
12–20 min · Model multiple viewpoints. Present the community scenario from the community scenario slides: the local council is deciding whether to redesign a riverside reserve. The proposal could include a playground, native planting, safer paths, and a space for community gatherings. Model thinking aloud about whose views might be sought, including mana whenua, nearby residents, kaumātua, tamariki, disabled people, recent migrants, local businesses, and people who use the reserve in different ways. Students identify one included voice and one voice that could be missing.
20–32 min · Viewpoint investigation. Place students in six groups of five and distribute the perspectives and participation worksheet. Give each group one perspective card on the worksheet, or assign a viewpoint: mana whenua representative, tamariki, kaumātua, disabled resident, recent migrant whānau, or local business owner. Students discuss what this person or group may value, what barriers might prevent participation, what they would want decision-makers to know, and what respectful response they would hope to receive. Groups record ideas without claiming that every person in a group thinks the same way.
32–40 min · Create an inclusion checklist. Show the checklist task and prompts. Groups combine their ideas into a four- to six-point checklist titled “A fair way to hear community voices”. Encourage specific actions, such as consulting mana whenua early, providing accessible venues and information, offering different ways to contribute, using clear language, allowing enough time, and explaining how feedback influenced the decision. Groups share one strongest checklist item while classmates listen for an idea they could add.
40–45 min · Reflect and assess. Revisit the plenary slides and ask, “How can listening to more perspectives lead to a fairer decision?” Students complete the Success Criteria exit ticket slips, identifying one success criterion they met and writing one action that would make participation more inclusive. Collect responses to inform the next lesson.
Join thousands of teachers using Kuraplan AI to create personalized lesson plans that align with Aligned with New Zealand Curriculum in minutes, not hours.
Created with Kuraplan AI
Generated using openai/gpt-5.6-luna
🌟 Trusted by 1000+ Schools
Join educators across New Zealand