Hero background

Turning Points Visual Timeline

AU History • 45 • 20 students • Created with AI following Aligned with Australian Curriculum (F-10)

Download now

Free PDF · we'll email you a copy

AU History
45
20 students
20 July 2026

Teaching Instructions

This is lesson 2 of 2 in the unit "Exploring the European Theatre". Lesson Title: Turning Points: Battles and Treaties Lesson Description: Building on the previous lesson, students will analyze major battles such as Verdun and the Somme, as well as the implications of the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk. They will work in groups to create a visual timeline, connecting these events and discussing their impacts on the war and Europe’s future.

Overview

This is Lesson 2 of 2 for “Exploring the European Theatre”. Students will examine two major turning-point battles (Verdun and the Somme) and consider what changed after the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk. They will then create a visual timeline that connects battles and treaties, explaining causes, effects, and continuity and change in the war and Europe’s future.

Learning intentions

Students will:

  • describe key causes and effects of major battles (Verdun and the Somme)
  • explain continuities and changes in the war after the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk
  • create historical descriptions and explanations using appropriate historical concepts and terms
  • use evidence from provided sources to support a short historical argument about “turning points”

Success criteria

  • I can identify at least three causes and two effects for Verdun or the Somme using evidence.
  • I can explain how the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk changed the war (at least one continuity and one change).
  • I can create a clear visual timeline with dates, event summaries, and annotations.
  • I can write a short argument stating why these events were turning points, supported by evidence.

Curriculum links

  • AC9HH7S05: describe causes and effects, and explain continuities and changes
  • AC9HH7K11: key beliefs, values and practices of an ancient society (not the focus in this lesson); instead, we address Year 7 European war content through historical concepts and evidence use
  • AC9HH7S08: create descriptions, explanations and historical arguments, using historical knowledge, concepts and terms that reference evidence from sources
  • General history capabilities: chronological reasoning, analysis of sources, and communication of historical ideas through structured responses and visual presentations

Lesson structure (45 minutes)

  1. 0–5 min · Hook: What counts as a turning point? Teacher displays three statements: “A turning point changes strategy”, “A turning point changes power”, “A turning point only matters if it ends the war”. Students think-pair-share which statements they agree with and why.

  2. 5–12 min · Direct teach: Verdun and the Somme as turning points Teacher briefly models using historical concepts (cause, effect, continuity, change) with a source snippet per battle (e.g., casualty figures, trench warfare descriptions, resource strain). Students complete a quick two-column note: “Cause (evidence)” and “Effect (evidence)” for Verdun or the Somme.

  3. 12–20 min · Mini-lesson: Brest-Litovsk and consequences Teacher explains what the treaty involved in simple terms (negotiation between powers, territorial changes, shifting alliances), stressing cause-effect and continuities (ongoing conflict in different regions) and changes (new borders, different priorities). Students underline the sentence in a source sheet that best shows “change” and circle the one that shows “continuity”.

  4. 20–37 min · Group task: Visual timeline with evidence Students work in groups of 4–5 to create a shared visual timeline covering: Verdun, the Somme, Brest-Litovsk, and a final “impact on Europe’s future” event card of their choice (teacher provides options such as shifting power, civilian impact, or later peace negotiations themes). Teacher circulates, prompts with: “What is the cause? What is the effect? What evidence proves it?” Students complete the timeline with:

  • dates for each event (or approximate dates if required by the source pack)
  • 2–3 bullet annotations per event that explicitly link to cause/effect and continuity/change
  • one piece of evidence copied/embedded (short quotation or paraphrased claim) per event
  • arrows connecting events with short labels (e.g., “resource strain contributed to…”)
  1. 37–44 min · Argument check: One paragraph “Why turning point?” Each group writes a 6–8 sentence historical argument using a structure: Claim → Reasons (2) → Evidence (2–3) → Conclusion. Students swap with another group for a “glow and grow”: one thing clear, one thing to strengthen (e.g., missing evidence, unclear continuity/change).

  2. 44–45 min · Exit ticket Students answer: “Which event was the biggest turning point and why?” (1–2 sentences) including one evidence reference from their timeline.

Resources

  • Source pack: short extracts on Verdun, the Somme, and the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk (images and short texts)
  • Timeline template (large sheet or digital slide) with spaces for dates, event summaries, and evidence
  • Event cards (or teacher-provided cards) for “Impact on Europe’s future” options
  • Coloured markers/highlighters (one colour for causes, one for effects, one for continuity/change)
  • Sticky notes for arrows/labels
  • Sentence starters for claims and evidence (e.g., “This shows…because…”, “The treaty changed…”, “A continuity was…”)
  • Rubric-style checklist (student-friendly): evidence included, cause/effect linked, continuity/change stated, argument written

Assessment

  • Formative: teacher checks group notes during timeline creation for correct cause/effect and explicit continuity/change.
  • Formative: teacher reviews one group’s timeline mid-way for evidence use and clarity of connections (arrows and labels).
  • Summative in-formal: exit ticket paragraph for historical argument and evidence integration.

Differentiation

  • Support: provide sentence starters and a checklist; assign roles in groups (timeline designer, evidence finder, cause/effect writer, continuity/change checker).
  • Support: for students needing it, allow approximate dates and offer pre-written evidence statements to select from.
  • Extension: groups must add an “alternative view” sentence (e.g., “Some historians may argue the turning point was…”) and justify with evidence.
  • EAL/SEN: allow dual-language support if available in class; provide simplified source versions plus a glossary of key terms (treaty, negotiation, territory, alliance, trench warfare, armistice if mentioned).

Create Your Own AI Lesson Plan

Join thousands of teachers using Kuraplan AI to create personalized lesson plans that align with Aligned with Australian Curriculum (F-10) in minutes, not hours.

AI-powered lesson creation
Curriculum-aligned content
Ready in minutes

Created with Kuraplan AI

Generated using openai/gpt-5.4-nano

🌟 Trusted by 1000+ Schools

Join educators across Australia