📊 Part 1: Multiple Choice Questions

Success Criteria: Identify key constitutional requirements and processes for Australian referendums

✍️ Part 2: Short Answer Questions

Success Criteria: Explain constitutional processes using appropriate legal terminology and demonstrate understanding of the 1967 referendum case study

Differentiation Support: Consider both the national vote AND the state-by-state requirements

Extension Challenge: Include at least three specific responsibilities

Key terms to use: bipartisan support, public awareness, social context

🤔 Part 3: Critical Thinking

Success Criteria: Evaluate the effectiveness of Australia's referendum process and propose evidence-based recommendations

Background: On 27th May 1967, Australians voted in a referendum to change two sections of the Constitution relating to Aboriginal people. The referendum achieved 90.77% support nationally and passed in all six states.

Your Task: Evaluate whether Australia's referendum process is too difficult or appropriately challenging for constitutional change. Use the 1967 referendum as evidence to support your argument.

Differentiation Options:

• Foundation Level: List 3 reasons why the process might be too difficult and 2 reasons why it's appropriate

• Advanced Level: Compare with other countries' constitutional change processes and recommend improvements