Technology Bias Inquiry

Learning Objectives

Aligned with the Quebec Secondary Cycle Two Social Studies Program (Secondary III, Grade 10) and the Cross-Disciplinary Competencies:

• Understanding societal issues and diversity
  • Analyse how technological tools and platforms influence social relationships and democratic life (General Competency 1: Exercises critical judgment).
• Apply critical thinking and ethical reasoning
  • Identify and critically evaluate different types of bias in technology and their social implications (Social Studies Competency 1: Practices critical and ethical judgment).
• Communication and reflection in written form
  • Develop personal and reasoned written reflections on the impact of technological bias on society and individual rights (Cross-Disciplinary Competency: Uses information).

Materials Needed

• Research handouts with guiding questions on technology bias (printed, one per student or pair)
• Access to tablets, laptops or library books (internet access optional but controlled)
• Notebooks or lined paper for writing reflections
• Pens and highlighters
• Whiteboard and markers
• Timer or clock visible to students

Classroom Setup

• Seating arranged in pairs but spaced to allow individual focus
• Access to research devices assigned per pair or individuals
• Clear wall or board space for key terms and instructions

---

Lesson Steps and Timings

1. Introduction & Framing (10 minutes)

• Teacher Role: Briefly contextualize the topic with 3 thought-provoking questions written on the board, e.g.:
  • What is "bias" in technology?
  • How can technology influence fairness in society?
  • Why should we be concerned about hidden bias in apps and algorithms?
• Students individually spend 3 minutes writing what they already know or think about these questions in their notebooks.
• Teacher elicits 2-3 student responses, writing key terms or ideas on the whiteboard.

2. Guided Independent Research (25 minutes)

• Distribute research handouts including definitions and examples of:
  • Algorithmic bias
  • Data bias
  • Representation bias
  • Examples: facial recognition bias, biased recommendation systems
• Students work alone or in pairs to research one assigned type of bias (ensuring coverage of all types in class).
• They use the resources (controlled internet or printouts) to answer guiding questions:
  • What is this bias, and how does it show up in technology?
  • Who is affected by this bias?
  • What are the social consequences?
• Teacher circulates to support critical thinking questions, clarifying concepts without giving answers.

3. Critical Analysis & Reflection (20 minutes)

• Students draft a one-page written reflection individually addressing:
  • Which type of technological bias troubled them the most and why.
  • Reflection on how this could affect their own lives or their community in Quebec.
  • Propose one ethical approach or solution to reduce this bias based on their research.
• Encourage students to use specific examples and avoid generalities.

4. Peer Comparison & Discussion (15 minutes)

• Students pair up (if they worked individually), share their reflections aloud briefly (3 minutes each).
• Together, they identify similarities and differences in their understanding and proposed solutions.
• Each pair jointly summarizes their discussion in 3-4 sentences written in their notebooks.

5. Closing & Assessment Instructions (5 minutes)

• Teacher invites a few volunteers to share insights or surprising facts learned.
• Explain homework: Finalize written reflection incorporating peer insights (set for next class).
• Collect research question sheets and peer-summaries for assessment.

---

Assessment

• Ongoing formative assessment through observation during research and reflection phases.
• Written reflections assessed for clarity, critical thinking, and use of specific examples aligned with Quebec's Social Studies competency criteria: reasoning quality, procedural knowledge, ethical judgement.
• Peer summaries evaluated for understanding diversity of perspectives.
• Teacher uses rubric focused on: comprehension of bias types, critical reflection quality, written communication, and ethical reasoning.

---

Differentiation Strategies

• For students needing support:

  • Provide simplified research handouts with step-by-step guiding questions.
  • Allow use of graphic organizers to help structure reflections.
  • Pair stronger readers/researchers with peers needing extra help.

• For advanced students:

  • Challenge them to find real Canadian examples of technology bias, including Quebec-specific tech applications or governance issues.
  • Require an additional paragraph connecting bias to broader social justice themes (e.g., systemic discrimination).

• Language accommodations:

  • Handouts and questions available in both English and French depending on student needs to allow full conceptual access.
  • Encourage bilingual students to express critical points in their stronger language, promoting deeper reflection.

---

This lesson integrates independent inquiry with critical social reflection, meeting Quebec curriculum demands to foster ethical thinking and social understanding around current technological issues affecting youth. It nurtures cross-disciplinary competencies by combining research, writing, and peer dialogue without relying on traditional lecture or presentation.