
English • Year 10 • 60 • 30 students • Created with AI following Aligned with New Zealand Curriculum
Free PDF · we'll email you a copy
This is lesson 1 of 10 in the unit "Voices for a Changing Climate". Lesson Title: Introducing Discursive Writing Lesson Description: Students explore the purpose, audience, and features of discursive texts through climate-change examples. They identify how writers analyse, reflect, explore, and speculate rather than argue a single position.
In this first lesson of Voices for a Changing Climate, students are introduced to discursive writing as a way of examining an issue from more than one perspective. Using short climate-change examples, they distinguish discursive writing from persuasive argument and identify how purpose, audience, language, tone, and structure shape meaning.
Students will:
0–7 min · Hook: one issue, different voices. Teacher displays two short statements from the climate-change opening slides: “Climate change is the greatest challenge facing our generation” and “What might climate change mean for communities in different parts of Aotearoa?” Students silently decide which statement sounds more like a firm argument and which invites exploration, then discuss their reasoning with a partner.
7–17 min · Direct teach: what is discursive writing? Teacher introduces the definition and features on the discursive writing teaching slides: a discursive text explores an issue by considering ideas, perspectives, evidence, possibilities, and implications rather than simply trying to make the reader agree. Students record a brief definition and sort the key purposes—analyse, reflect, explore, and speculate—against teacher-provided examples on the discursive writing investigation sheet.
17–29 min · Guided close reading. Teacher reads two short climate-change extracts from the paired climate extracts aloud, modelling how to notice cautious verbs, questions, modal language, contrast, evidence, and inclusive or impersonal phrasing. Students annotate each extract, identifying its purpose, likely audience, tone, and one feature that makes it discursive; they then share one observation with another pair.
29–42 min · Collaborative comparison. Teacher displays the comparison task and sentence prompts on the text comparison and discussion slides. In groups of three, students compare a discursive extract with a single-position argument from the worksheet. They complete a table covering purpose, audience, viewpoint, structure, tone, language choices, and treatment of evidence, then prepare one evidence-based comparison beginning, “Unlike the argumentative text, the discursive text…”
42–53 min · Apply: create a discursive opening. Teacher models transforming the statement “Schools should ban cars near the gate” into a more exploratory opening, such as: “Reducing traffic near school gates could improve safety, although it may create difficulties for some whānau.” Students write a two- or three-sentence opening on a climate-related issue, such as school energy use, public transport, or adaptation to extreme weather. Their opening must acknowledge at least two considerations and use one exploratory or speculative phrase, such as “One possibility is…” or “This may suggest…”
53–60 min · Share and exit reflection. Teacher invites two or three students to read their openings and revisits the success criteria on the plenary and exit slides. Students complete the final section of the self-check and exit reflection: define discursive writing, name one feature, and explain how their own opening avoids arguing only one side. Collect responses to identify priorities for lesson 2.
Join thousands of teachers using Kuraplan AI to create personalized lesson plans that align with Aligned with New Zealand Curriculum in minutes, not hours.
Created with Kuraplan AI
Generated using openai/gpt-5.6-luna
🌟 Trusted by 1000+ Schools
Join educators across New Zealand