
Science • Year 11 • 50 • 30 students • Created with AI following Aligned with New Zealand Curriculum
Free PDF · we'll email you a copy
Friction and energy loss can be investigated by measuring the force needed to pull the same object across different surfaces using a spring scale. Record and graph the results, then recommend which surface would be most suitable for a chosen purpose, such as sports shoes, bicycle brakes, or playground flooring.
Students investigate how different surfaces affect the force needed to pull the same object. They collect numerical data, calculate means, graph results, and use evidence to recommend a surface for a practical purpose such as sports shoes, bicycle brakes, or playground flooring.
0–5 min · Hook and prediction. Teacher opens the friction hook and learning-intentions slides with a visual comparison of a runner, bicycle brake, and playground surface, then asks, “Should the surface with the greatest friction always be chosen?” Students make a prediction and briefly justify it in pairs.
5–12 min · Teach the key ideas. Teacher uses the friction, variables, and energy-transfer slides to explain friction as a contact force opposing motion, and as an energy transfer from mechanical energy to thermal energy; model how to read a spring scale at steady speed. Students identify the physical system, write the variables, and answer a quick check: “Where does the transferred energy go?”
Establish:
12–16 min · Practical briefing and setup. Teacher demonstrates attaching the spring scale, pulling horizontally and steadily, reading the scale without jerking, and recording units in newtons. Teacher distributes the friction investigation worksheet and assigns groups of three with roles: equipment manager, puller, and data recorder. Students predict the ranking of three or four available surfaces and check their group’s method before beginning.
16–29 min · Investigate. Teacher circulates, checks safe handling and fair testing, and prompts groups to repeat each surface at least three times. Students pull the same object across each surface, record the force for each trial, note observations, and calculate a mean force for each surface. If a reading fluctuates, students record the agreed method for choosing a consistent reading rather than selecting a convenient result.
29–39 min · Process and graph data. Teacher pauses the class to model a graph on the graphing and data-analysis slides, including a descriptive title, labelled axes, units, and an appropriate scale. Students complete their results table and create a graph comparing surface with mean pulling force, by hand or using a spreadsheet if available. They identify the surface with the greatest and least average force and describe any unusual result.
39–47 min · Apply and explain. Teacher displays the recommendation discussion slides and gives each group one purpose: sports shoes, bicycle brakes, or playground flooring. Students write a short recommendation on the worksheet using the structure: “For ___, I recommend ___ because…”. They must refer to at least two data points and explain that friction transfers mechanical energy into thermal energy. Groups share one recommendation; the class considers why maximum friction may not be ideal for every purpose.
47–50 min · Exit check. Teacher asks students to complete the final section of the conclusion and exit-ticket section independently: “Describe one change to the system, identify the energy transfer, and give one improvement to this investigation.” Students hand in the worksheet or submit a clear photograph of their final response.
Join thousands of teachers using Kuraplan AI to create personalized lesson plans that align with Aligned with New Zealand Curriculum in minutes, not hours.
Created with Kuraplan AI
Generated using openai/gpt-5.6-luna
🌟 Trusted by 1000+ Schools
Join educators across New Zealand