Peer Review: Sharing Reflections

Overview

In this 50-minute lesson, students will develop critical reading and writing skills through peer-review of reflective travel writing. By evaluating each other’s work with structured criteria, students will deepen their understanding of clarity and descriptive detail, key components of the Year 7 English curriculum as set out in the National Curriculum for England. This will support their progress towards writing effectively for different purposes, including personal reflection.

---

National Curriculum Links

Writing (Years 7–9):

• Pupils should be taught to:
  • Plan, draft, and write imaginative, informative and persuasive texts, selecting appropriate grammar and vocabulary, understanding how such choices can change and enhance meaning.
  • Evaluate and edit by assessing the effectiveness of their own and others’ writing, proposing changes to vocabulary, grammar and punctuation to enhance effects and clarify meaning (Writing – Key Stage 3 Programme of Study).

Reading:

• Develop positive attitudes to reading and understanding of what they read by:
  • Checking their understanding by discussing the purpose, audience and context of the writing.
  • Identifying and discussing themes and conventions across a range of writing.

Spoken Language:

• Articulate and justify answers, arguments and opinions.
• Use spoken language to develop understanding through speculating, hypothesising, imagining and exploring ideas.

---

Learning Objectives

By the end of the lesson, students will be able to:

1. Apply peer-review techniques to provide constructive, specific feedback on clarity and descriptive detail in reflective writing.
2. Use agreed success criteria to identify strengths and areas for improvement in peers’ reflective travel writing.
3. Reflect on feedback received and consider how to revise their writing to enhance clarity and description.
4. Take part in respectful and focused oral discourse to justify their feedback.

---

Resources

• Students’ first drafts of reflective travel writing (lesson 3 output)
• Peer review checklist handouts (focus on clarity and detail)
• Writing tools: pens, paper, notebooks, or laptops/tablets if available
• Whiteboard or flipchart for criteria and shared notes
• Timer

---

Lesson Structure

1. Starter (5 minutes)

• Activity: Quick whole-class recap on what makes reflective writing effective.
• Teacher prompts:
  • “What do we mean by clarity in writing?”
  • “How does descriptive detail help a reader?”
• Goal: Activate prior knowledge and prepare students for focused feedback.
• National Curriculum focus: Spoken language – articulating and justifying ideas.

2. Introduction to Peer Review (5 minutes)

• Explain the purpose of peer review: to help each other improve writing by providing clear, specific feedback.
• Share and discuss a simple peer review checklist focusing on:
  • Clarity: Is the main idea clear? Are sentences straightforward and easy to follow?
  • Descriptive detail: Are senses and feelings described well? Are details vivid and engaging?
• Model an example: Show a short anonymised writing extract on the whiteboard, and demonstrate how to give friendly, constructive feedback.
• National Curriculum focus: Writing – evaluating and editing, Reading – understanding purpose and context.

3. Peer Review Pairs (20 minutes)

• Students swap writing drafts with a partner.
• Using the checklist, each student reads their partner’s piece carefully and notes feedback—highlighting strengths and suggestions.
• Tip for students: Use “Two stars and a wish” method (two positive comments, one suggestion for improvement).
• Encourage students to annotate directly on the text or use separate feedback sheets.
• Teacher circulates, prompts deeper consideration, and scaffolds language for giving and receiving feedback respectfully.

4. Feedback Discussion (10 minutes)

• Students share their feedback verbally with their partner, explaining their points calmly and clearly.
• Encourage the writer to ask clarifying questions or paraphrase the feedback to check understanding.
• Teacher invites a few pairs to share good examples of effective feedback with the class (anonymous or volunteered).
• Emphasise respectful communication and growth mindset.
• National Curriculum focus: Spoken language – justifying opinions and listening to others.

5. Reflection and Next Steps (5 minutes)

• Students write a brief reflection in their books/notebooks:
  • What did I learn from giving feedback?
  • What feedback did I find most useful?
  • What changes do I plan to make in my next draft?
• Teacher collects reflections as formative assessment to track understanding and engagement with peer review process.
• Set homework/task: Revise the reflective piece considering peer feedback for next lesson.

---

Assessment Opportunities

• Formative assessment through observation of peer discussion and feedback quality.
• Review of students’ written peer feedback against checklist criteria.
• Reflection responses indicate metacognitive awareness of writing improvements.

---

Differentiation

• Provide sentence starters for peer feedback (e.g., “I liked how you described…”, “It was unclear when…”).
• Pair stronger writers with peers who benefit from more support.
• Allow verbal feedback recording for students who struggle with writing.
• Challenge higher-attaining students to suggest vocabulary or sentence structure improvements.

---

Extension / Enrichment

• For early finishers, invite them to create a short spoken summary explaining one improvement suggestion and why it would make the writing stronger.
• Encourage students to reflect on cultural or emotional elements from travel and how description can enhance empathy in writing.

---

This lesson leverages collaborative learning and metacognition to develop the key Year 7 National Curriculum skills of writing clarity, descriptive detail, and constructive critique. It builds independence and develops students’ critical faculties in a supportive peer environment, helping them become thoughtful writers and readers.