Social SciencesFreePrintable

Social Enterprise Funding Options

A free social sciences worksheet ready for your classroom. Open in Kuraplan to grab the print-ready PDF, customize it for your students, or generate a fresh version in seconds.

Download now

Name:Date:

Social Enterprise Funding Options

Read the case study, then compare funding options and recommend a realistic funding mix. Use evidence from the scenario in your explanations.

Case study: Second Serve

Second Serve is a proposed social enterprise in regional Australia. It will collect surplus food from local growers and shops, then provide affordable produce boxes to households experiencing food insecurity. Its pilot needs $18,000 for a refrigerated trailer, food-safe storage and delivery costs. If successful, the team hopes to expand to nearby towns. The founders want to protect the mission, keep produce affordable and report clearly on the food rescued and households reached.

Funding snapshot

Use this comparison for the questions. Amounts and conditions are fictional examples for the case study.

Option

Possible amount

What is expected?

Main consideration

Community grant

$10,000

Use funds for approved project costs; report outcomes.

Competitive application; may be restricted to specific costs.

Crowdfunding

$2,000–$8,000

Share the campaign widely; supporters may receive a thank-you or reward.

Success is uncertain and promotion takes time.

Social investment

$5,000–$15,000

Agree on repayment or a financial return, alongside social goals.

The enterprise must be able to meet the agreed terms without undermining its mission.

Trading income

Grows as produce boxes are sold

Earn income by selling goods or services.

Income depends on customers and must cover ongoing costs.

Decode the options

1.Match each funding option to its best description: 1. grant; 2. crowdfunding; 3. social investment; 4. trading income. A. Money earned by selling products or services. B. Many supporters contribute, often through an online campaign. C. Funding provided for an agreed purpose, usually without repayment. D. Funding where the provider expects a financial return as well as social outcomes.

1. Grant
2. Crowdfunding
3. Social investment
4. Trading income

B. Contributions from many supporters
A. Money earned from selling products or services
D. Funding with expected financial and social returns
C. Funding for an agreed purpose, usually without repayment

2.Second Serve needs equipment for its pilot and must show how public-purpose money is used. Which option best fits that need, and what condition should the team check before applying?

3.A crowdfunding campaign attracts 120 supporters, each contributing $25. How much does it raise before any platform fees?

4.Which statement best explains a key difference between a grant and social investment?

A grant is generally repayable with interest, while social investment never has conditions.
A grant is usually not repaid but may have rules; social investment normally involves an agreed financial return or repayment.
A grant is money from customers, while social investment is always a donation.
There is no difference: both are always free money with no reporting.

5.The founders plan to charge $12 for each produce box. If they sell 150 boxes in a month, calculate the month's sales revenue before costs.

6.Which option identifies two likely challenges for Second Serve when seeking funding?

Grant applications may be competitive, and the team may need evidence of impact.
Crowdfunding guarantees the target will be reached, and has no promotion costs.
Social investment never requires repayment, and trading income arrives before any sales.
Grant money can always be spent on any purpose, and all funders avoid reports.

7.Second Serve receives a $10,000 grant and raises $4,000 through crowdfunding. How much of the $18,000 pilot target is still unfunded?

8.Recommend one practical way to cover the remaining $4,000. Explain one benefit and one risk or condition of your choice.

9.The team is offered investment on the condition that it doubles box prices, even if some households can no longer afford them. What is the main concern, and what should the founders do before accepting?

10.True or false: Trading income can support long-term financial sustainability, but sales revenue is not the same as profit because the enterprise still has costs to pay.

TrueFalse

11.Name two useful measures Second Serve could report to show its social impact to a grant provider or community supporters.

12.Write a brief funding recommendation for Second Serve's pilot. Suggest a mix of at least two options and explain how it balances mission, funding risk and future sustainability.