Social SciencesFreePrintable

Australian Human Rights Laws

A free social sciences worksheet ready for your classroom. Open in Kuraplan to grab the print-ready PDF, customize it for your students, or generate a fresh version in seconds.

Download now

Name:Date:

Australian Human Rights Laws

Read the briefing and examine the text pathway before completing the case study and analysis. Use evidence from the materials and your knowledge of Australian civics.

Briefing: How human rights are protected in Australia

Australia has no single national Human Rights Act. Protection comes from a combination of federal and state or territory laws, the Constitution, courts, and political processes. Federal laws prohibit discrimination in areas such as race, sex, disability and age. The Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC), established under the Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986, educates the public, advises government and investigates and conciliates some complaints. Conciliation aims to help parties reach an agreement; the Commission does not act as a court and generally cannot impose a binding remedy. If a complaint under federal discrimination law is terminated, a complainant may be able to take the matter to the Federal Court or Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia. The courts apply legislation and can make legally binding decisions. Treaties matter too. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) sets out a broad international statement of rights. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) covers rights such as expression, political participation and fair trial. The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) covers matters such as education, health and work. When Australia ratifies a treaty, it accepts international obligations, but the treaty does not automatically become enforceable domestic law. Parliament may implement treaty commitments through legislation. Treaty obligations can also influence law-making and interpretation, and can be considered by the AHRC in some inquiries.

1. A person makes a complaint to the AHRC under a relevant federal law.

2. The AHRC may investigate and offer conciliation to help resolve the complaint.

3. If the complaint is terminated, the person may be able to apply to a federal court. The court can make a binding decision.

Apply the briefing

1.Which statement best describes the AHRC’s role in a complaint under federal discrimination law?

It writes all federal human rights laws and prosecutes offenders.
It can investigate and try to help resolve some complaints, but it is not a court.
It automatically awards compensation whenever a complaint is made.
It enforces every international treaty directly in Australian courts.

2.Correct the error in this claim: “The Australian Human Rights Commission Act was established in 1996.” Give the correct year and explain what the Act establishes or supports.

3.Match each instrument to its main characterisation.

UDHR
ICCPR
ICESCR

Treaty focused on economic, social and cultural rights
International declaration setting out a broad foundation of human rights
Treaty focused on civil and political rights

4.Complete the statement using the briefing: Ratifying a treaty creates international obligations for Australia, but the treaty does not automatically become domestic law.

5.Complete the statement using the briefing: Parliament can give effect to treaty commitments by passing .

6.True or false? If the AHRC offers conciliation, it can force both parties to accept a binding outcome. Explain your answer in one sentence.

Case file: The roster change

Bodhi works at a small Australian business. After she tells her manager she is pregnant, the manager removes her from customer-facing shifts and says, “Customers prefer someone who will be here long term.” Bodhi believes she has been treated unfairly because of pregnancy. She asks the AHRC what options may be available. The details here are hypothetical; they are not a report of a real case.

7.Identify the possible human-rights or discrimination issue in Bodhi’s case. Name one fact from the case that supports your identification.

8.Using the pathway, explain two things the AHRC might do and one thing it cannot do as part of the complaint process.

9.A classmate says, “Because Australia ratified the ICCPR, every part of it can be enforced directly in an Australian court.” Is this accurate? Give a reason and explain one way a treaty can still influence Australian law or decisions.

10.Assess one strength and one limitation of Australia’s human-rights protection system, using the briefing or pathway as evidence. Finish with a judgement about why multiple protection mechanisms may matter.

11.Make a reasoned recommendation: name one change that could strengthen human-rights protection in Australia, and give one likely benefit and one possible challenge of your proposal.