EnglishFreePrintable

Gangs Then and Now

A free english worksheet ready for your classroom. Open in Kuraplan to grab the print-ready PDF, customize it for your students, or generate a fresh version in seconds.

Download now

Name:Date:

Gangs Then and Now

Read the two fictional case studies and compare what they reveal about youth groups, belonging, technology and community responses. Use evidence from the texts; avoid assuming that every group or young person is the same.

Case study A: The Harbour Street Crew, 1966

The Harbour Street Crew was a fictional group of teenagers who met near a row of shops in an Australian port suburb. Their members came from different families, but most lived within walking distance of one another. Some wore similar jackets, and they guarded the streets they thought of as theirs. Arguments with a rival group sometimes became physical. A local newspaper described the teenagers as a public nuisance, while a youth worker argued that the label ignored the lack of safe places for young people to meet. Not everyone in the crew joined for the same reason. Amira liked having friends who would stand up for her. Len wanted somewhere to go after school while his mother worked late. Others were drawn in by older friends. The crew did not have a formal leader or a written set of rules, although a few confident members often influenced decisions. Police spoke to the group after fights, and a neighbourhood centre later opened an evening drop-in session. Some teenagers attended; others did not.

Case study B: The Junction Group, today

The Junction Group is a fictional group of teenagers in a present-day Australian suburb. They first got to know one another through sport, school and mutual friends. Some members use a group chat to plan where to meet, share music and check that friends got home safely. A community worker has also heard that a few older contacts pressure some teenagers to carry packages for money. The worker says the group should not be treated as if every member is involved in crime. For Kai, the group offers friendship and a feeling of safety on the walk home. Harper joined because her cousin was already there. One teenager said that quick messages can help people organise, but rumours and threats can spread just as quickly. Police have investigated reports of intimidation, while a local youth service offers sport, mentoring and help with study or work. Some teenagers use the service; others are wary of being judged. The group has no single public identity: members make different choices, and their relationships can change over time.

Read closely

Answer using details from both case studies. The examples are fictional and do not represent every youth group or every decade.

1.Which statement best describes one similarity between the two groups?

Every member joins for the same reason.
Friendship and a sense of safety matter to some members.
Both groups have a formal leader and written rules.
Neither group has contact with adults.

2.Name one difference between how the groups communicate or organise, using a detail from each case study.

3.In Case study A, what does the youth worker suggest the newspaper’s label “public nuisance” leaves out?

That the teenagers all had jobs.
That there were few safe places for young people to meet.
That the group had a written constitution.
That the teenagers never argued.

4.Find two reasons for joining or staying with a group in the case studies. Identify which person or case each reason comes from.

5.True or false: The Junction Group is described as having a single public identity, and every member is involved in crime. Explain your answer with evidence.

6.What two contrasting effects of digital messages are described in Case study B?

7.How do adults or community organisations respond in each case study? Give one example from each.

8.The writer includes different viewpoints, such as the newspaper and youth worker in Case study A. What does this contrast encourage readers to consider?

9.Complete the comparison: One feature that appears in both periods is ; one feature that is different is . Support each choice with evidence.

10.A community centre has room for one new weekly activity. Based on both case studies, suggest an activity and explain how it might help while recognising that it will not solve every problem.