Social SciencesFreePrintable

Constitutional Amendment Quiz

A free social sciences worksheet ready for your classroom. Open in Kuraplan to grab the print-ready PDF, customize it for your students, or generate a fresh version in seconds.

Download now

Name:Date:

Constitutional Amendment Quiz

Read the information and referendum scenarios. Choose, match, and explain using accurate civics vocabulary. Referendum outcomes are hypothetical unless stated otherwise.

Referendums and the Constitution

Section 128 of the Australian Constitution sets out how it can be changed. A proposed change must first pass both houses of the Commonwealth Parliament, usually by an absolute majority in each house. If one house passes it twice and the other house rejects or fails to pass it, a limited alternative route may apply. The proposal is then put to voters in a referendum. To succeed, it needs a double majority: more than half of all voters across Australia must vote Yes, and Yes votes must exceed No votes in at least four of the six states. Votes in the territories count towards the national majority but not the state majority. The Governor-General issues the writ for the referendum, and a successful proposal becomes law after royal assent.

1.Which body normally initiates a proposed constitutional amendment by passing a bill?

The Commonwealth Parliament
The High Court
The Governor-General acting alone
A majority of state premiers

2.What does the double majority require?

A majority of voters nationally and a majority in at least four states
A majority in every state and territory
Two-thirds of voters nationally
Approval by both houses of Parliament after the referendum

3.The territories vote Yes by a large margin, but only three states vote Yes. The national Yes vote is 58%. Does the proposal pass? Explain which part of the double majority decides the result.

4.A surf lifesaving club is discussing a proposed constitutional change about emergency coordination. The bill passes both houses of Parliament, then goes to a referendum. Put these stages in the correct order by writing 1–4 beside each: voters decide at a referendum; bill passes through Parliament; successful change receives royal assent; Governor-General issues the referendum writ.

5.Match each term to its meaning.

Referendum
Double majority
Royal assent

The formal approval that makes a successful amendment law
A national vote on a proposed constitutional change
A national voter majority plus majorities in at least four states

Reading referendum results

In 1967, voters approved a constitutional amendment concerning Aboriginal people by an overwhelming majority. The amendment removed the words that excluded Aboriginal people from being counted in the Commonwealth census and changed section 51(xxvi), enabling the Commonwealth Parliament to make laws for Aboriginal people. The vote did not itself grant the right to vote, create native title, or immediately deliver equality. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander activism and advocacy were important to the campaign and the long struggle for rights.

6.Which statement about the 1967 referendum is accurate?

It changed constitutional provisions about census counting and Commonwealth law-making concerning Aboriginal people.
It created native title rights.
It was the first time Aboriginal people could vote in any Australian election.
It immediately ended all legal discrimination.

7.The high Yes vote in 1967 is often linked to sustained activism, public campaigning, and broad political support. Explain how two of these factors could help a referendum campaign.

8.True or false: A referendum can pass if it wins the national vote, even when it wins in only three states.

TrueFalse

9.Give one reason the double majority protects the states, and one way this requirement can make constitutional change more difficult.

10.A proposed change receives 51% Yes nationally and wins in four states. State X has the largest population and votes overwhelmingly No. Does the proposal pass under the double majority rule? Explain.

11.In 4–5 sentences, assess whether Australia's constitutional amendment process appropriately balances stability with democratic change. Use at least one benefit and one drawback of the double majority, and refer to how a referendum campaign can shape voter understanding.