Social SciencesFreePrintable

Treaty Principles Today

A free social sciences worksheet ready for your classroom. Open in Kuraplan to grab the print-ready PDF, customize it for your students, or generate a fresh version in seconds.

Download now

Name:Date:

Treaty Principles Today

Read the briefing and the fictional council case study. Then answer the questions using evidence from the material. This worksheet compares Aotearoa New Zealand and Australia; it does not assume that the two countries have the same history or legal arrangements.

Briefing: treaty principles in Aotearoa New Zealand

Te Tiriti o Waitangi / the Treaty of Waitangi was signed in 1840 by representatives of the British Crown and many Māori rangatira (chiefs). The Māori and English texts differ in important ways, and people continue to debate their meaning and effects. It is a founding document of Aotearoa New Zealand, not an Australian treaty. In modern Aotearoa New Zealand, the ideas often called the principles of the Treaty are used in some laws, public decisions and court discussions. The exact principles and their application can depend on the context. Three commonly discussed ideas are: • Partnership: the Crown and Māori should act towards one another in good faith and work together on matters affecting Māori. • Participation: Māori should have meaningful opportunities to take part in decisions that affect them. • Protection: the Crown has responsibilities to actively protect Māori interests, including taonga (treasures), language, culture and wellbeing. These ideas do not mean that every decision is made in the same way, or that every disagreement disappears. Their practical effect depends on the law, the decision being made and how people are involved.

Case study: Te Awa council proposal (fictional)

A fictional Aotearoa New Zealand council is planning repairs beside Te Awa, a river important to a local iwi. The council invites iwi representatives to a planning group before choosing a design. The group discusses river health, access to a wāhi tapu (sacred place), and signs that include te reo Māori. The council changes the proposed path to avoid the wāhi tapu and agrees to review water-quality results with the iwi after construction. The case study does not say that the iwi agrees with every part of the plan. It gives examples of actions to analyse, not proof that a real council or iwi took these actions.

Council action

Possible connection to a principle

Invites iwi representatives onto the planning group before selecting a design

Participation; potentially partnership if representatives can genuinely influence decisions

Changes the path to avoid a wāhi tapu

Protection of an important Māori place and interest

Agrees to review water-quality results with the iwi after construction

Ongoing cooperation; potentially partnership and protection

Australia connection

Australia has distinct First Nations histories and political arrangements. There is no single national treaty between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and the Australian Government. Treaty, agreement-making and truth-telling processes differ across states and territories and between communities. The Aotearoa New Zealand principles in this worksheet should not be presented as Australian law. They can, however, prompt questions about how governments listen, share decision-making and protect First Nations interests in the Australian context.

1.Which statement best describes the status of Te Tiriti o Waitangi / the Treaty of Waitangi?

It is a founding document of Aotearoa New Zealand, with continuing debates about its meaning and effects.
It is a treaty between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and the Australian Government.
It means every modern decision in New Zealand must be made jointly by all Māori and non-Māori residents.
It is only a historical document and has no connection to present-day public decisions.

2.Match each commonly discussed principle with the description that best fits it: partnership, participation, protection.

Partnership
Participation
Protection

Actively safeguarding Māori interests, including taonga, language, culture and wellbeing.
Working together in good faith on matters affecting Māori.
Meaningful opportunities for Māori to take part in decisions that affect them.

3.In the Te Awa case study, which action most clearly shows participation?

The council invites iwi representatives to the planning group before selecting a design.
The council finishes construction before sharing any information.
The council removes all Māori-language signs from the proposal.
The council decides that water quality is unrelated to the project.

4.Identify one action in the case study that could show protection. Explain which Māori interest it may protect.

5.The council agrees to review water-quality results with the iwi after construction. Give one reason this could support partnership, and one reason it could support protection.

6.True or false: The case study proves that the iwi supports every part of the council's proposal. Explain your answer using a detail from the briefing or case study.

7.A council holds one meeting after it has already chosen a design, then says the community was involved. What is one limitation of this approach when considering participation?

8.Which statement makes the most careful comparison between Aotearoa New Zealand and Australia?

The countries have different histories and arrangements; New Zealand's Treaty principles should not be described as Australian law.
Australia has the same national treaty and the same Treaty principles as New Zealand.
Because both countries have First Nations peoples, their treaty histories are identical.
Treaty-related ideas have no relevance to any discussion about Australian government.

9.In an Australian state or territory, a government is discussing an agreement-making process with local First Nations communities. Name one useful question, inspired by this worksheet, that decision-makers could ask. Explain why it matters. Do not assume the New Zealand principles are Australian law.

10.Write a short evidence-based conclusion: choose one Te Awa council action, name a principle it may reflect, and explain one limitation or question that would need further evidence before judging how well the principle was applied.