EnglishFreePrintable

Nature Debate Sentence Starters

A free english worksheet ready for your classroom. Open in Kuraplan to grab the print-ready PDF, customize it for your students, or generate a fresh version in seconds.

Download now

Name:Date:

Nature Debate Sentence Starters

At a local bookshop’s youth debate, Cooper, Jarrah and Ivy are preparing to discuss this motion: “Nature is more powerful as a force for renewal than as a force of destruction.” Use the debate notes and sentence starters below to practise building arguments, listening carefully and responding respectfully. Sample answers are provided; other well-supported answers may also work.

Debate notes

Use these fictional notes as shared evidence. A community report says that after a bushfire, native plants began growing again in some areas once conditions allowed. The report also says that fire can destroy homes and habitat, and that recovery may take a long time. It does not claim that every fire has the same effects.

1.Which position best supports the motion while acknowledging the debate notes? Choose one.

Nature only renews, so destruction should not be discussed.
Nature can renew ecosystems, but destructive events can cause serious harm and recovery is not guaranteed to be quick.
Nature is always destructive because bushfires happen.
The report proves that every burned area returns to exactly the same condition.

2.Complete this opening sentence for the affirmative side: “Our team supports the motion because nature can .”

3.Complete this sentence with one detail from the debate notes: “The debate notes show this when .”

4.Match each sentence starter to its purpose: making a claim, introducing evidence, or acknowledging a different view.

“Our position is that…”
“The report notes that…”
“We recognise that…, however…”

Acknowledging a different view
Making a claim
Introducing evidence

5.True or false? The debate notes prove that every bushfire leads to full ecosystem recovery in a short time. Correct the statement if it is false.

TrueFalse

6.The opposing speaker says, “Bushfires destroy habitat, so nature cannot renew itself.” Write a respectful rebuttal using this starter: “While we agree that…, the notes also show…”

7.Imagine Jarrah says: “A recovering landscape should not make us ignore people whose homes or habitat were damaged. We need to recognise both the renewal and the loss.” In one sentence, paraphrase Jarrah’s main point without copying the wording.

8.After hearing Jarrah’s point, write one open-ended question that would help the speaker explain their reasoning or evidence.

9.Cooper hears someone say, “Nature always bounces back, so there is nothing to worry about.” Which response is most balanced and evidence-aware?

That is wrong because nature never recovers.
The notes suggest some renewal can occur, but they also say fire can cause serious harm and recovery may take a long time.
Yes, every place recovers completely.
There is no point discussing evidence because everyone has an opinion.

10.Write a two- or three-sentence closing statement for either side of the motion. Summarise your position, refer to one detail from the notes, and finish with a sentence that leaves the audience thinking.

11.Complete the reflection: “A respectful listener shows they are listening by…”. Give one specific action that would help during this debate.