Social StudiesFreePrintable

Opium Wars Analysis Worksheet

A free social studies worksheet ready for your classroom. Open in Kuraplan to grab the print-ready PDF, customize it for your students, or generate a fresh version in seconds.

Opium Wars Analysis Worksheet worksheet preview
Name:Date:

Opium Wars Analysis Worksheet

Use the source cards and your knowledge of the Opium Wars (1839–1842 and 1856–1860). Support interpretations with specific evidence. Distinguish what a source says from what you infer.

Source cards: trade, conflict and treaties

A. Before the wars, Britain bought Chinese tea, silk and porcelain in large quantities. China accepted payment mainly in silver. British merchants and officials sought goods they could sell in China to reduce this outflow of silver. The East India Company cultivated opium in India and sold it to private traders, who smuggled it into China despite Qing restrictions. B. In 1839, Qing official Lin Zexu ordered the confiscation and destruction of opium held by foreign merchants at Humen. Britain sent a military expedition; fighting began. The Treaty of Nanjing (1842) required China to pay an indemnity, open five ports to British trade, and cede Hong Kong Island to Britain. It did not make all of China a British colony. C. The Second Opium War involved Britain and France fighting Qing China (1856–1860). The Treaty of Tianjin (1858) and Convention of Beijing (1860) expanded foreign privileges, opened additional ports, permitted foreign diplomats to reside in Beijing, and confirmed the cession of southern Kowloon (south of Boundary Street) and Stonecutters Island to Britain. The treaties also allowed Christian missionary activity and provided for further indemnities. D. A Qing memorial might argue: “Opium harms our people and drains silver; stopping its trade is a duty of government.” A British trader might argue: “Our goods should be admitted under fair trade rules.” These are contrasting claims, not neutral descriptions. The opium trade involved coercion, addiction, and unequal military power; Chinese officials and communities did not all respond in the same way.

1.Trace the chain of economic pressures described in Source A. Explain how the silver imbalance encouraged British involvement in the opium trade, and identify one reason this explanation is not a moral justification.
2.Which statement best describes the relationship between Qing restrictions and the First Opium War, according to Sources A and B?
  • The Qing government encouraged opium imports, leading Britain to protect Chinese traders.
  • Qing efforts to suppress an illegal opium trade contributed to a conflict in which Britain used military force.
  • Britain began the war to end all trade between China and Europe.
  • The conflict was caused only by a dispute over Hong Kong Island.
3.Put these events in chronological order by writing 1–4 beside each: Treaty of Nanjing; destruction of opium at Humen; Convention of Beijing; Treaty of Tianjin.
183918411843184518471849185118531855185718591860
4.In Source D, compare the Qing official’s claim with the British trader’s claim. Identify each speaker’s concern and explain how their different positions may shape what each leaves out.
5.Select two outcomes of the Treaty of Nanjing listed in Source B.
  • China ceded Hong Kong Island to Britain.
  • China paid an indemnity to Britain.
  • China became entirely a British colony.
  • All foreign troops left China permanently.
6.Evaluate the statement: “The Opium Wars were only about opium.” Use at least two details from the source cards to support a more precise interpretation.
7.True or false? The Treaty of Nanjing made all of China a British colony. Correct the statement if it is false.
TrueFalse
8.Compare one consequence of the First Opium War with one consequence of the Second. What does the comparison suggest about the changing extent of foreign privileges?
9.Source D presents two elite viewpoints. Name one group whose experiences are not directly represented, then describe one likely effect of the wars or opium trade on that group. Mark the effect as an inference rather than a direct quotation from the source.
10.Write a short evidence-based conclusion responding to this question: Why do historians connect the Opium Wars with the idea of a “Century of Humiliation”? Include one treaty consequence and explain why the phrase is an interpretation of a longer historical period, not the name of a single event.

3 printable pages

  • Opium Wars Analysis Worksheet, page 1 of 3: Source cards: trade, conflict and treaties

    Page 1

  • Opium Wars Analysis Worksheet, page 2 of 3: 2. Which statement best describes the relationship between Qing restrictions and the…

    Page 2

  • Opium Wars Analysis Worksheet, page 3 of 3: 7. True or false? The Treaty of Nanjing made all of China a British colony. Correct the…

    Page 3

About This Worksheet

Free in Kuraplan

Sign up free, grab the PDF, and customize it for your class.

Print-Ready

Formatted for standard paper. Clean layout, easy to read.

AI-Generated

Created with Kuraplan's AI, designed for real classroom use.

For Teachers & Parents

Use in classrooms, for homework, tutoring, or homeschool.

Need a custom version of this worksheet?

Kuraplan's AI generates custom worksheets in seconds — differentiated for every learner, aligned to your curriculum.

Generate Custom Worksheets — Free
No credit card Curriculum-aligned Under 60 seconds